Merrill Lynch Strategic Return Notes (SRNs) Investment Lawsuit Fraud
Merrill Lynch SRNs Lawsuit Banner

Merrill Lynch sold Strategic Return Notes (“SRNs”) to retail investors through Bank of America during the period 2010-2011. These investments have lost more than 90% of their value due to undisclosed costs, and Merrill Lynch is the subject of numerous lawsuits, and a Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) investigation.

The SEC found that Merrill Lynch misrepresented the costs of this investment product and fined the company $10 million
 

How Did Merrill Lynch’s Strategic Return Notes Work

Merrill Lynch Banner

During the period 2010-2011, Merrill Lynch (owned by Bank of America) sold investment funds known as Strategic Return Notes (SRNs). The company sold $150 million of these notes to approximately 4,000 retail investors. These complex investment notes do not pay interest but instead have a maturity of five years, and pay a variable return based upon the performance of a proprietary volatility index (“VOL”).

The investment offer by Merrill Lynch failed to adequately disclose certain fixed costs, and in fact made it appear as if the product had relatively low fixed costs. Merrill Lynch’s material emphasized that investors would be subject to a 2% sales commission and a 0.75% annual fee. The material failed to disclose a third fixed, regularly occurring cost included in its proprietary volatility index known as the “Execution Factor”.

The Execution Factor increased the cost of each unit by 1.5%. Because the hypothetical portfolio the VOL was calculated turned over each quarter, the Execution Factor imposed a cost of 1.5% on the Index each quarter. The Index also included a feature called the Index Multiplier which increased the daily Index calculation by 120% including the effect of the Execution Factor.

Read More

According to the Securities and Exchange Commission: "A reasonable retail investor would have considered it important to the total mix of information available when purchasing the SRNs that the Execution Factor imposed a transaction cost of 1.5% of the Index value each quarter, accruing on a daily basis.

Merrill Lynch’s failure to adequately include the Execution Factor rendered the cost disclosures relating to the fixed 2% sales charge and 0.75% Index Adjustment Factor materially misleading. . . . As a result of the negligent conduct described above, Merrill Lynch violated Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act which prohibits obtaining money or property by means of material misstatements and omissions in the offer or sale of securities."

The SEC ordered Merrill Lynch to cease and desist from committing similar violations in the future, and the brokerage company agreed to pay a $10 million penalty to settle charges that clients were misled about the investments. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority also fined the company for negligent disclosure failures over the sale of the notes. To read the SEC order, click: SEC Findings

 
Why Choose Us

Our law firm has been in existence for more than 60 years, and is considered a national leader in this type of litigation. We have received well over 150 jury verdicts throughout the country in the amount of $1 million or more, and achieved verdicts and settlements in excess of $3 billion.

We are the founder of Mass Torts Made Perfect, which is a national seminar attended by approximately 800 lawyers twice per year where we help teach the successful handling of cases against the world’s largest corporations. For more information, please visit our About Us section.

in business 60 years - $3 billion in verdicts and settlements - listed in Best Lawyers in America, SuperLawyers and Trial Lawyers Hall of Fame
What Does It Cost

Our lawyers provide absolutely free confidential consultations, and if we are fortunate enough for you to hire us, we never will charge you any fees or costs unless you first recover. To review a summary of our fees and costs, click Fees & Costs.

Contact Information

To contact us for a free confidential consult, you can call us at (800) 277-1193 (toll free). You also can request a confidential consultation by clicking Free & Confidential Consult, which form will be immediately reviewed by one of our attorneys handling the Merrill Lynch litigation.

Read More

Have There Been Any Significant SRN Settlements

As of this time, there have been no large group settlements involving the Strategic Return Notes issues by Merrill Lynch. Litigation likes this takes many years to resolve, with teams of lawyers spending millions of dollars trying to determine exactly what occurred, and how it could have been prevented.

Generally, large groups of settlements do not occur until such time as a few cases are tried in the arbitration process, and the investment company is able to more thoroughly understand its financial risk. This in no way means you can wait to hire an attorney and file a lawsuit.

Just the opposite, if you wait, you could permanently lose all of your rights, even if a settlement occurs in the future. This is because every state has time limitations in which you can file a lawsuit for any injuries that you have sustained or could sustain resulting from your investment losses in Merrill Lynch’s Strategic Return Notes.

 

Merrill Lynch SRN Whistleblowers

Merrill Lynch SRN Whistleblowers

In August 2011, Merrill Lynch brokers Glen Ringwall and Mark Manion recorded phone calls with Brian Partridge, head of U.S. product sales for Merrill’s wealth-management division at the time, and also Mark Ryan, a manager at the firm Ringwall and Manion worked.

Ringwall and Manion were complaining that the Strategic Return Notes had been devastating to their clients, and stated “This is borderline crooked.” Partridge disagreed. He admitted the costs were higher than expected, but claimed it was due to market conditions. He claimed the investors were on the wrong side of the market, stating: “We’ve been, quite frankly, snake bitten.”

Ringwall and Manion were told not to suggest to their clients the product was flawed. “We can’t just tell everyone, ‘Hey this is a defective product’”, Ryan told them.

Both Ringwall and Manion eventually ceased employment with Merrill Lynch and began working with UBS in July 2012. They submitted a whistleblower complaint with the SEC in September 2013.

 
Merrill Lynch News Banner

Merrill Lynch SRN Lawsuit News

Merrill Lynch Paying $10 Million Penalty for Misleading Investors in Structured Notes

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Merrill Lynch has agreed to pay a $10 million penalty to settle charges that it was responsible for misleading statements in offering materials provided to retail investors for structured notes linked to a proprietary volatility index. To read more, click Securities and Exchange Commission

SEC Readies Case Against Merrill Lynch Over Notes That Lost 95%

The Securities and Exchange Commission is preparing a civil enforcement case against Merrill Lynch over an investment that fell as much as 95% in value and was marketed in a way that one of the firm’s financial advisers called “borderline crooked,” people close to the probe said. To read more, click Wall Street Journal

Merrill Lynch Likely Facing a Lawsuit After A Product Lost As Much As 95% of its Value

The Securities and Exchange Commission is readying a civil enforcement case against the firm for an investment that lost as much as 95% of its value, according to the Wall Street Journal citing people familiar with the matter. The case deals with a set of the bank’s structured notes, a custom-made debt security built with options and other derivatives. Merrill raised $150 million by selling the Strategic Return Note over several months in 2010. But as a result of market volatility, the five-year notes quickly lost their value while the cost associated with buying the options tied to the note rose. To read more, click Fortune